Thursday, November 13, 2014

Movie Review - Batman: The Dark Knight



I do not always write dry, boring accounts of detailed nonsense. Sometimes I watch movies. Afterwards I subject my family to rantings, ravings, and incessant blathering about certain particularities of subtly nuanced obscurity buried in the deep, dark, recessed corners of the movie. Other times I make sense.

This time I watched Batman: The Dark Knight.



Batman: The Dark Knight was released on the 18th of July 2008, which makes this movie review Six-and-a-half years too late. If you have not yet seen Batman: The Dark Knight, then you probably never will, which is fine, because it was not that good. Here’s why…

The movie begins with a bank robbery. Bank robberies are usually very boring. Most bank robbers walk in, hand the teller a note asking for money, leave, and then go to Starbucks for a Caramel Macchiato and a lemon bar. Finally they go to jail, because robbing banks is illegal and Starbucks has security cameras.

The bank robbers in Batman: The Dark Knight do not behave in the typical polite fashion. They are very mean. They have guns and they push people. One of the bank patrons has a gun as well. Actually, I think he was an employee; most likely a loan officer.

Loan officers are like police officers, except loan officers are much worse. Both officers give you papers to sign, which require you to pay money. The difference is that, based on a mortgage loan’s amortization schedule, you will pay much more money to a bank for buying a house than you ever will pay to a judge because you were speeding while trying to get to Starbucks before they sold out of lemon bars.


While the ill-behaved thieves bungled their way through their nefarious deed, the brave loan officer produced a sawed-off shotgun from his pencil drawer. This was to be expected. Accountants have dangerous jobs and, in addition to 10-key machines and sticky notes, most have personal protection devices nearby.

What happened next, however, was so unbelievable that it ruined the entire rest of the movie. In fact, after I retell the atrocious event that transpired I will end this review. That is unless you want to hear about a man with extraordinary financial resources, supported by a team of gadget-making assistants, who single-handedly defeats an evil villain’s plot to harm civilians. And as always, James Bond wins in the end. Um…I mean Batman.

The valiant accountant approached his enemies, gun raised, prepared to defend his honor, the bank’s reputation, and stacks of inflation-devalued fiat currency. He shot once. He shot twice. He shot again and again, and I think he shot again. I can’t remember, because I had stopped counting. My mouth was hanging open in shock. I could not fathom how anyone, even a financial expert, could miss at such close range with a shotgun.



Disbelief can be suspended only so much. After this, my mind was unable to pretend that a guy in a plastic suit could jump off buildings, ride magnetic balloons out of windows and defeat rooms full of gun-wielding maniacs. Not to mention the scene when Batman drove the bat-motorcycle around the Joker instead of driving straight into him. Why didn’t Batman hit him with the bat-motorcycle? That would have severely injured the Joker. At the very minimum he would have been in intensive care for months while healing.

Then the police could have easily given him a ticket. Or even worse, they could have given the Joker a Long Term Adjustable-Rate Mortgage Loan. Let’s see him get out of that trap!


Wednesday, November 5, 2014

A New Normal, Part 3


Wherein I continue the meeting between me and another missionary.


Clergy, not laymen


“A New Normal” is a multi-part story of how I came to be a Missionary to Papua New Guinea. Click Here to read the second installment, and Here to read the first.


I have made a decision. At the end of the last installment of  "A New Normal, Part 2" I told you I was going to tell you what the newly-called missionary told me. I have decided that I am only going to tell you half of what he told me. At the end you will know why, although you will not be satisfied. But you will understand, in part, why I pursued the missionary field. At least, I think you will. Alright, here goes.

We were at a play date. There were three families present: Two seminarian-families and one layman-family.

Tangential aside (which might just win the award of "earliest 'tangential aside' in writing history"): I do not like the word 'layman'. Although I know, understand, and agree with its meaning and usage, I object to its sound. Before I continue, allow me to insert the definition, taken from www.dictionary.com:


Layman
noun, plural laymen.
1. a person who is not a member of the clergy; one of the laity.
2. a person who is not a member of a given profession, as law or medicine.


George Washington, layman

Now I am going to ask you to do something. I need you to take action; you must participate in this exercise before you can continue this blog with any hope of grasping my meaning. What I ask is simple, and almost anyone can do it.

You need to say the word 'layman' out loud. Do not do this if you are an air-traffic controller. In that case wait until your break or when you are off work so as to avert disaster. Everyone else, including babies, should say it...right...now!

Some of you said  /lay-mun/  and blurred the 'm' and the 'n' almost into the same sound. Others said  /lay-min/  because you were trying to emphasize the 'man' portion. It really doesn't matter how you said the second part, because both of you said the first part correctly. Congratulate yourself. Now continue...


Albert Einstein, layman

What everyone heard is the 'y' and the 'm' blur together. and that is the root of my dislike. Now watch as I transform a perfectly kind word into an insult. I begin by separating the word into syllables, then transition them into similar sounding equivalents. Regretfully, the end result will shock you.

lay - man
laym - man
lam - man
lame - man

Lame man!!

See?? Now do you understand!?? That is what I hear every time the word is said aloud. No, I do not assume the speaker meant to be demeaning or degrading. No, I do not launch into a long-winded explanation of the audible derivative of their utterance. No, I am not calling for an end to the ministry because of a poor-sounding designation. Neither am I demanding an end to the clerical distinction because of an unfortunate aural association.


I have an idea about how to fix this. As tempting as it would be to include the clergy in our plight and call them 'non-layman', I think we should leave them alone and come up with something new to describe ourselves. I suggest going with the opposite meaning and using that to create our new word. Since the opposite of 'lame' is 'cool' we simply go with:

Coolman

We will also accept Awesomeman, Magnificentman, Wonderfulman, or...Wait, I've got it!


Superman


Here ends my tangential aside, and this article. To be continued (began) in part 4...



In the next installment of A New Normal, I will get around to actually telling you historic information about me becoming a missionary without getting side-tracked off into coo-coo land. Hopefully there will be some of you who will stick around to read it.


p.s. The families, briefly mentioned, belong to: Pastor Christopher Gerdes, Pastor Peter Haugen, and Superman Michael Ritzman.